When is a Bonus Not a Bonus?

David McLaren • September 27, 2017

Having worked In the UK for many years and having been used to the way things are done there, I thought I would flag some of the differences and similarities in the UK / Aussie system.

One of the biggest frustrations I found in the UK, was that once you had finally identified a potential suitable match for a candidate and organisation alike, things could quite quickly grind to a halt when it comes to the total rewards/remuneration package. No matter how thorough the initial brief on what exactly was on offer, the amount of times there was either something overlooked, by both candidate and/or organisation was astounding. Sometimes it was to the benefit of the prospective candidate and sometimes to the detriment. Over in the UK, the various benefits on offer can perhaps be more varied compared to Australia. Australia is generally a mix of base salary, + 9.5% super (for now) + 20 days annual leave. Throw in an additional bonus and possibly salary sacrificing options and you probably have all the different variables covered.

In the UK, packages are often broken down as follows:

  • Standard base salary
  • Possibly a car (what level and what happens when you leave the company) or car allowance
  • Pension which could have several different options in terms of what you contribute
  • Private health for either yourself or family membership
  • Days holiday which could also have a variable figure
  • Bonus
  • Possible membership payments (eg for the CA or CPA)
  • Sometimes a London weighting allowance

Having so many different variables potentially up for grabs, everyone was aware that there was sometimes ‘wriggle-room’ for the right candidate. This was where some of the consultants really were able to make a difference and obtain the right offer for the right candidate, to both the candidate’s and the hiring manager’s satisfaction.

Fast forward to what is now to my sixth year in Australia and I have realised that maybe whilst the variety of benefits on offer might be narrower, there is still flexibility. Base salary can always be potentially negotiated up or down. Knowing exactly those parameters is vital before we start wasting everyone’s time, including mine! The biggest ‘red flag’ though, is always when a hiring manager states the potential offer is base salary + super + the ‘usual’ benefits. ‘Usual’ benefits - what’s that?

I will use these definitions when clarifying total rewards’ packages:

  • Base salary means base salary not including super.
  • Package means base + super.
  • Total rewards package means base + super + any bonus potential + any car/allowance if there is one.

So, bonus potential ; let me outline the varieties that I have heard in recent years. To be honest, there is not an awful lot of difference between the UK and Australia, but it’s something definitely worthwhile to think about.

Guaranteed bonus (there is such a thing but not common). Here, candidates are ‘guaranteed’ X% of their package (base or final package). X will differ depending on your work level. It could also be that as long as you start work at 8.00am and finish at say 5.00pm, you are almost guaranteed the payment. However, it might be based on your own performance, regardless of how well the company/division is doing. If you are doing a good job, you receive your bonus but if you are deemed to be underperforming, you don’t.

Bonus based on divisional and/or Corporate performance and/or individual performance . Often a sliding scale percentage, but also quite often mixed with individual and company performance e.g. if your division and/or the corporate performance has been above a certain threshold, and your individual contribution has been high/exceptional, then you could be looking forward to at least some of the bonus payable. Again, if 1 or 2 of these parameters are not met, that could result in some or all of the bonus potential not being paid.

When is the bonus paid ? At the end of the financial year generally… but what happens if you hand your notice in beforehand; do you still get paid? Sometimes . Some bonuses are payable just by being an employee at a certain date, whilst others you only get paid on the basis you haven’t handed in your notice. This is quite often one of the things a job seeker can overlook. Clearly, this is also sometimes a difficult thing to clarify with your direct manager if you are thinking about moving on.

When did you start with the organisation ? By commencing with the organisation within six months of a bonus period entitlement, do you forfeit all the potential bonus on offer? For example, for those commencing in February 2017, is their bonus payable for the June 30 2017 year, as they didn’t qualify? So does this mean that the first bonus payment could be June 2018? Is it a sliding scale or an all-or-nothing policy?

As mentioned above, is a bonus based on base salary or on total package amount? If there is a bonus, what amount, on average, has been paid in the recent years? I would rather have 5% of something, rather than 25% of nothing. Is there a way you can find out and does it depend on the seniority of the role?

So, a real range of variables, which could really make a difference on whether you accept a role or not, or when you give notice to resign. What would also be really helpful, is that before you engage with a recruitment consultant, to either source talent or if you are job hunting yourself, you determine exactly the structure of the rewards’ package is, or what exactly you are earning. It could save us all, a lot of time.

Find the job you love I Find the right talent
Get in touch with people2people

Australia   I   United Kingdom

In business since 2002 in Australia, NZ, and the United Kingdom, people2people is an award-winning recruitment agency with people at our heart. With over 12 offices, we specialise in accounting and finance, business support, education, executive, government, HR, legal, marketing and digital, property, sales, supply chain, and technology sectors. As the proud recipients of the 2024 Outstanding Large Agency and Excellence in Candidate Care Awards, we are dedicated to helping businesses achieve success through a people-first approach.



Share insights

Recent articles

By Sharna Bryant June 18, 2025
Discover the latest developments in Australia’s sales sector, where AI integration and talent acquisition are reshaping the industry. With expansion plans underway and evolving skills in demand, this update explores how companies are navigating recruitment challenges and preparing for 2025. Learn which roles are most in demand, what benefits are attracting top talent, and how businesses are responding to ongoing turnover.
By Colleen Deere June 11, 2025
Australia has made intentional wage theft a criminal offence, with tough new penalties now in force. In this blog, we break down what the changes mean, common employer mistakes, and how to stay compliant in 2025. Featuring expert insights from Antonino Meduri of AM Law & Partners, it's essential reading for business owners, HR professionals, and payroll teams navigating the new Fair Work landscape.
Explore the legal and ethical essentials of managing redundancies in Australia. Featuring expert ins
By Leanne Lazarus June 10, 2025
Explore the legal and ethical essentials of managing redundancies in Australia. Featuring expert insights from employment law and HR specialists, this blog outlines the key obligations, common pitfalls, and practical steps for handling role changes with compliance and care. Ideal for HR leaders and employers navigating workforce change.
By Suhini Wijayasinghe May 29, 2025
AI is rapidly transforming industries around the globe, and the human resources sector in Australia and New Zealand is no exception. With 54% of HR teams already investing in AI tools, according to people2people's Employment and Salary Report, it's clear that automation and predictive technologies are no longer futuristic concepts—they're part of today's evolving workforce strategy. Though nearly half of these organisations report no significant impact yet, the momentum is undeniable. From talent acquisition to onboarding and learning development, AI is starting to reshape how HR teams operate. Yet the journey is not without its complexities. "AI isn't a buzzword—it's a business advantage" Juma Mrisho, Talent Acquisition Business Partner, highlights the tangible gains AI can offer. "In terms of speed, efficiency, and decision-making accuracy, it’s definitely not just a buzzword," he explains. AI is already being used to streamline admin-heavy tasks, improve candidate matching, and personalise employee training pathways. However, barriers to broader adoption remain. As Mrisho points out, "The idea of inertia and resistance to change is something embedded in all of us." Concerns about return on investment, high costs, and the complexity of new systems are slowing uptake. Many traditional organisations are hesitant, needing time and guidance to adapt. Kaajal Khelawan, HR Manager and Operations Lead, addresses a common myth: "The biggest misconception is that AI will replace HR jobs. But the reality is it’s there to support them." She notes that AI tools require proper oversight, customisation, and human input to be effective—far from being plug-and-play solutions. Khelawan also warns against rushing implementation. "We’ve seen people adopt AI without fully understanding it, feeling pressured to innovate quickly," she says. For AI to work meaningfully, organisations must invest in education, planning, and change management. Looking ahead, both experts believe this is only the beginning. Mrisho envisions AI becoming a core part of HR over the next three to five years, powering everything from workforce planning to performance management. "The rapid growth of AI in just six to twelve months has been enormous. Thinking about where we’ll be in five years is genuinely exciting," he says. While AI opens the door to new possibilities, it also demands thoughtful integration. For HR teams in Australia and New Zealand, the focus must now shift from hype to strategy. As Khelawan concludes, "It’s best to approach it with an open mind. There are pros and cons, but with the right attitude, organisations can meaningfully assess how to adopt and benefit from it." In 2025 and beyond, HR professionals who balance innovation with insight will be best positioned to lead their teams into a smarter, more agile future.
By Colleen Deere May 22, 2025
In a major step to protect Australian workers, the federal government criminalised wage theft under the Fair Work Legislation Amendment Act 2023. From 1 January 2025, employers who knowingly underpay employees face penalties including fines up to $7.825 million or three times the amount underpaid. Individuals could also face up to 10 years in prison. This crackdown, driven by the growing concern that wage theft costs workers up to $1.5 billion annually, aims to create a culture of fairness and accountability in Australian workplaces. To explore how these changes are playing out, Colleen Deere, Acting Branch Manager at people2people in Perth, spoke with Antonino Meduri, Principal at AM Law & Partners. Their discussion shed light on what the new laws mean for businesses, the common pitfalls that still occur, and how organisations can proactively ensure compliance. "Employers now face serious criminal penalties for deliberate underpayments" Antonino explained the law's key shift: intentional wage theft is now a criminal offence. This applies to both direct entitlements like wages and leave, and indirect ones such as superannuation. Crucially, the law distinguishes between unintentional errors and knowing breaches. "Criminal conduct doesn’t happen when an employer is careless or even reckless. It happens when they knowingly underpay while being aware of their legal obligation to pay more," Antonino clarified. The legislation introduces four major components: criminalisation of wage theft, significant financial penalties, a self-reporting pathway that may prevent prosecution, and a voluntary code for small businesses. The self-reporting mechanism, in particular, offers a pathway for businesses that uncover underpayments and cooperate with the Fair Work Ombudsman to avoid criminal charges. Common Mistakes That Still Lead to Underpayment Claims While intentional wage theft garners the most attention, Antonino noted that most underpayments stem from avoidable errors rather than malice. He highlighted several frequent mistakes: Misclassifying employees : Many errors begin with incorrect award classification, especially in sectors like hospitality and aged care. "Failing to properly consider the legal obligations under the Fair Work Act can snowball into significant liabilities," Antonino warned. Incorrect penalty rates : Employers sometimes overlook weekend or holiday rates or fail to include casual loading during leave. Assuming salaried employees are always compliant : Even when a salary appears generous, if the employee's entitlements under the award are higher, the employer must make up the difference. Unpaid work : Trials or internships where the worker performs productive tasks must be paid, regardless of how the arrangement is labelled. What Good Compliance Looks Like in 2025 Antonino stressed the importance of prevention over reaction. "Good compliance is preventative and not reactive. It's about systems, transparency, and leadership," he said. Here are the key elements he advised businesses to adopt: Accurate classification and regular reviews : Ensure employees are correctly classified under the appropriate award and reassess annually. Pay audits : Regularly verify that pay matches the hours worked and entitlements due, especially for salaried staff. Strong record-keeping : Maintain detailed wage and time records for at least seven years. These not only ensure legal compliance but also serve as vital defence documents in case of claims. Training and accountability : Keep HR and payroll teams updated on legislative changes. Define clear roles for compliance oversight. Early response : If an error is discovered, fix it promptly, pay interest, and engage the Fair Work Ombudsman where necessary. Protecting Legal and Reputational Interests  Beyond compliance, Antonino offered advice on safeguarding a company’s legal and reputational standing: Embed compliance in governance : Treat wage compliance as a leadership issue, not just a payroll task. Independent audits : An external payroll or classification audit can uncover hidden risks before they escalate. Document everything : From employee classification to wage audits, detailed documentation forms the cornerstone of a legal defence. Clear response plans : Have strategies in place for backpay, media management, and engagement with regulators. Foster a culture of integrity : Encourage staff to raise concerns, protect whistleblowers, and promote wage compliance as a shared responsibility. Antonino concluded with a warning: non-compliance can not only invite legal consequences but also drain a business's time and resources. "Being proactive and transparent isn’t just about law—it’s good business." In summary, the new wage theft laws signal a strong shift towards accountability and fairness in Australia’s labour market. Businesses that embrace this change, investing in robust systems and a culture of compliance, will not only avoid legal trouble but build trust and resilience for the future.

Latest Media Features


Get in touch

Find out more by contacting one of our specialisat recruitment consultants across Australia, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom.

Contact us